DST vs. Direct Property Ownership: Which Is Better for Your Next 1031 Exchange?

Real estate investors looking at their 1031 exchange options to defer capital gains taxes and build long-term wealth often consider two main options: reinvesting back into direct property ownership and Delaware Statutory Trust (DST). Both strategies offer distinct benefits and drawbacks, making it essential to understand how they compare before deciding which best aligns with your investment goals.

What Is Direct Property Ownership?

Direct ownership means an investor purchases and controls a real estate asset outright. This traditional investment model provides full decision-making power over the property, including management, financing, renovations, and sale timing.

Advantages of Direct Ownership:

• Full control over property management, leasing, and improvements.
• Potential for higher returns through active management and appreciation.
• Ability to leverage financing for increased purchasing power.

Challenges of Direct Ownership:

• Hands-on responsibility for maintenance, tenant issues, and expenses.
• Market fluctuations and vacancies can impact cash flow.
• Tax liabilities if selling without a 1031 exchange.

What Is a DST in a 1031 Exchange?

A DST allows investors to own a fractional interest in institutional-grade real estate passively, while benefiting from 1031 exchange tax deferral. Managed by professional sponsors, DSTs offer access to commercial real estate assets like multifamily housing, medical offices, and industrial properties.

Advantages of DST Investments:

• Tax Deferral: Investors can defer capital gains taxes by rolling proceeds from a property sale into a DST.
• Passive Income: No active property management responsibilities.
• Diversification: DSTs allow investors to own portions of multiple properties across different markets.
• Access to Institutional Real Estate: DSTs provide entry to high-value properties typically unavailable to individual investors.

Challenges of DST Investments:

• Investors give up control of property management decisions.
• DSTs are illiquid, requiring a long-term investment commitment.
• Once invested, there is no option to refinance or add leverage.

Key Differences Between DST 1031 Exchanges and Direct Ownership

Which Option Is Right for You?

The choice between DST and direct ownership depends on an investor’s preferences, risk tolerance, and financial goals. Investors seeking full control and hands-on involvement may prefer direct ownership. Those looking for passive income, tax deferral, and portfolio diversification may find a DST more appealing.

Making an Informed Real Estate Investment Decision

Both direct property ownership and DST offer unique advantages. Understanding the differences can help investors align their strategy with their financial goals. Whether prioritizing control or seeking tax-efficient passive income, working with a financial professional can ensure the best investment decision for your portfolio.

General Disclosure